https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378765 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI due to the appellant's continuous non-appearance for the hearing, despite prior adjournment requests. The appellant's lack of interest in prosecuting the matter was evident. Moreover, the case involved an amount below the monetary limit set by Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed based on non-prosecution and exceeding the monetary limit, with the order finalizing the dismissal pronounced in open court. en-us Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Apr 2019 08:07:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378765 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI due to the appellant's continuous non-appearance for the hearing, despite prior adjournment requests. The appellant's lack of interest in prosecuting the matter was evident. Moreover, the case involved an amount below the monetary limit set by Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed based on non-prosecution and exceeding the monetary limit, with the order finalizing the dismissal pronounced in open court. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378765