<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1205 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the tax demand and penalties imposed under the Finance Act, 1994, concerning the interpretation of taxable services for the period from April 2007 to March 2010. The case involved determining tax liability based on the relationship between the appellant and a trust regarding &#039;goods transport agency service.&#039; The Tribunal emphasized that tax liability falls on the recipient of the service, not individual operators, and called for further examination of expenditure labeled as &#039;freight&#039; before taxation. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision, stressing the need for thorough verification of expenses labeled as &#039;freight&#039; for clarity and compliance with tax provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2019 07:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1205 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the tax demand and penalties imposed under the Finance Act, 1994, concerning the interpretation of taxable services for the period from April 2007 to March 2010. The case involved determining tax liability based on the relationship between the appellant and a trust regarding &#039;goods transport agency service.&#039; The Tribunal emphasized that tax liability falls on the recipient of the service, not individual operators, and called for further examination of expenditure labeled as &#039;freight&#039; before taxation. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision, stressing the need for thorough verification of expenses labeled as &#039;freight&#039; for clarity and compliance with tax provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>