<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1197 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378753</link>
    <description>SAD paid on de-bonding of a 100% EOU was held creditable where no exemption under the relevant customs notification was availed at the time of import. The exemption notification relied on by the department was treated as inapplicable to goods cleared on de-bonding, so the goods could not be treated as exempt for the purpose of denying CENVAT credit. On that basis, the demand was unsustainable and the assessee&#039;s entitlement to credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2019 07:33:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1197 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378753</link>
      <description>SAD paid on de-bonding of a 100% EOU was held creditable where no exemption under the relevant customs notification was availed at the time of import. The exemption notification relied on by the department was treated as inapplicable to goods cleared on de-bonding, so the goods could not be treated as exempt for the purpose of denying CENVAT credit. On that basis, the demand was unsustainable and the assessee&#039;s entitlement to credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>