https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378752 Revisional interference with reassessment was refused because the authorities below had recorded concurrent findings that the assessee's Form-F declarations were bogus and that the claimed consignment or inter-State sales were not proved. The High Court noted that service of notice, the validity of the reassessment proceedings, and the genuineness of the supporting declarations were all decided on the material on record, and no perversity, illegality, or contradiction with the record was shown. In the absence of any such defect, no substantial question of law survived, so the reassessment and denial of exemption were maintained. en-us Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Apr 2019 07:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378752 Revisional interference with reassessment was refused because the authorities below had recorded concurrent findings that the assessee's Form-F declarations were bogus and that the claimed consignment or inter-State sales were not proved. The High Court noted that service of notice, the validity of the reassessment proceedings, and the genuineness of the supporting declarations were all decided on the material on record, and no perversity, illegality, or contradiction with the record was shown. In the absence of any such defect, no substantial question of law survived, so the reassessment and denial of exemption were maintained. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378752