https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280121 The Court allowed the appeal to proceed without requiring the revisionist to deposit any further tax amount, provided the revisionist furnished security for the remaining tax amount demanded. The main issue centered on the availability of Form 'F' for stock transfer, and as the revisionist had already paid 10% of the disputed tax amount, the Court decided to hear the appeal without additional tax deposit. The revisionist was directed to provide security, other than cash or bank guarantee, for the balance 20% of the tax demanded, ensuring the appeal could proceed smoothly. en-us Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Apr 2019 07:19:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280121 The Court allowed the appeal to proceed without requiring the revisionist to deposit any further tax amount, provided the revisionist furnished security for the remaining tax amount demanded. The main issue centered on the availability of Form 'F' for stock transfer, and as the revisionist had already paid 10% of the disputed tax amount, the Court decided to hear the appeal without additional tax deposit. The revisionist was directed to provide security, other than cash or bank guarantee, for the balance 20% of the tax demanded, ensuring the appeal could proceed smoothly. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280121