<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1607 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280123</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeals, directing the AO to re-examine and verify additional evidence for depreciation on preoperative expenses, and to allow the entire expenditure on various fees and upfront fee in the year they were claimed. The issue of loose tools expenditure was also remanded back to the AO for re-examination. The general grounds raised were dismissed as they were deemed general in nature and did not require adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2019 07:19:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1607 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280123</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeals, directing the AO to re-examine and verify additional evidence for depreciation on preoperative expenses, and to allow the entire expenditure on various fees and upfront fee in the year they were claimed. The issue of loose tools expenditure was also remanded back to the AO for re-examination. The general grounds raised were dismissed as they were deemed general in nature and did not require adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>