https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280111 The court held that the amended qualifications would apply prospectively to candidates who acquired equivalent qualifications before the amendment, but not to vacancies occurring before the amendment date. The judgment emphasized that while rules can be amended retrospectively, such changes cannot take away vested rights. The petitions were to be listed before an appropriate bench for decisions consistent with this ruling. en-us Fri, 11 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Apr 2019 16:18:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280111 The court held that the amended qualifications would apply prospectively to candidates who acquired equivalent qualifications before the amendment, but not to vacancies occurring before the amendment date. The judgment emphasized that while rules can be amended retrospectively, such changes cannot take away vested rights. The petitions were to be listed before an appropriate bench for decisions consistent with this ruling. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280111