https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280102 Where a special law prescribes a limitation period for an application for special leave to appeal, but the Limitation Act schedule prescribes none, Sections 4 to 24 of the Limitation Act apply through Section 29 unless expressly excluded; accordingly, Section 5 can excuse delay. On that basis, the delay in filing the special leave petition was condoned. As to the remaining accused, the Court rejected the triviality reasoning and considered the acts to amount to hurt under the Penal Code, but declined special leave because the matter was old and the parties had already endured prolonged litigation and expense. en-us Fri, 11 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Apr 2019 11:07:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280102 Where a special law prescribes a limitation period for an application for special leave to appeal, but the Limitation Act schedule prescribes none, Sections 4 to 24 of the Limitation Act apply through Section 29 unless expressly excluded; accordingly, Section 5 can excuse delay. On that basis, the delay in filing the special leave petition was condoned. As to the remaining accused, the Court rejected the triviality reasoning and considered the acts to amount to hurt under the Penal Code, but declined special leave because the matter was old and the parties had already endured prolonged litigation and expense. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280102