<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1505 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280100</link>
    <description>CBDT&#039;s revised monetary threshold for filing departmental appeals was applied because the tax effect in the case was below Rs. 10 lakhs. As the appeal fell within the low tax effect category, it was not entertained and was dismissed solely on that ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2019 10:29:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1505 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280100</link>
      <description>CBDT&#039;s revised monetary threshold for filing departmental appeals was applied because the tax effect in the case was below Rs. 10 lakhs. As the appeal fell within the low tax effect category, it was not entertained and was dismissed solely on that ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>