<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1187 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378743</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the original authority for proper consideration under section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962, emphasizing the need for rectification of errors in the bills of entry to ensure accurate classification of imported goods. The appeal was disposed of based on the requirement for addressing errors in import documentation for compliance with customs regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2019 09:40:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1187 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378743</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the original authority for proper consideration under section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962, emphasizing the need for rectification of errors in the bills of entry to ensure accurate classification of imported goods. The appeal was disposed of based on the requirement for addressing errors in import documentation for compliance with customs regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>