<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1177 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378733</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reimbursement of service tax paid by the assessee to the Government, and reimbursed by ONGC, should not be included in the aggregate amount for computing profits under Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act. The court emphasized that service tax is not part of the gross receipts and should not be considered in the computation of profits under Section 44BB. The decision was in line with the Delhi High Court&#039;s judgment and circulars issued by the CBDT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1177 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378733</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reimbursement of service tax paid by the assessee to the Government, and reimbursed by ONGC, should not be included in the aggregate amount for computing profits under Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act. The court emphasized that service tax is not part of the gross receipts and should not be considered in the computation of profits under Section 44BB. The decision was in line with the Delhi High Court&#039;s judgment and circulars issued by the CBDT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>