<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1164 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378720</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow deduction u/s 80IB(10) on a pro-rata basis for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15, despite alleged violations of the IT Act. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed as the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning, supported by judicial precedents, was deemed sound and consistent. The ITAT maintained judicial consistency between the two assessment years, dismissing both Revenue&#039;s appeals and assessee&#039;s Cross Objections. All appeals were dismissed without costs, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1164 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378720</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow deduction u/s 80IB(10) on a pro-rata basis for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15, despite alleged violations of the IT Act. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed as the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning, supported by judicial precedents, was deemed sound and consistent. The ITAT maintained judicial consistency between the two assessment years, dismissing both Revenue&#039;s appeals and assessee&#039;s Cross Objections. All appeals were dismissed without costs, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>