https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378714 The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) affirmed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A))'s decision to uphold additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) regarding cash, gold coins, and diamond jewelry in the income of the assessee. Despite explanations provided by the assessee on the source of these items, the additions were maintained. The ITAT dismissed the appeal due to the assessee's failure to appear during the process, resulting in an ex-parte decision with no new evidence to challenge the CIT(A)'s findings. The additions made by the AO and CIT(A) were upheld, and the appeal was dismissed without costs. en-us Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378714 The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) affirmed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A))'s decision to uphold additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) regarding cash, gold coins, and diamond jewelry in the income of the assessee. Despite explanations provided by the assessee on the source of these items, the additions were maintained. The ITAT dismissed the appeal due to the assessee's failure to appear during the process, resulting in an ex-parte decision with no new evidence to challenge the CIT(A)'s findings. The additions made by the AO and CIT(A) were upheld, and the appeal was dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378714