<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1157 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378713</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, removing the addition of excess remuneration disallowed by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal found that the excess remuneration was repaid by adjusting future remuneration, demonstrating compliance with the law, and thus concluded that no violation of the Companies Act or Income Tax Act had occurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1157 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378713</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, removing the addition of excess remuneration disallowed by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal found that the excess remuneration was repaid by adjusting future remuneration, demonstrating compliance with the law, and thus concluded that no violation of the Companies Act or Income Tax Act had occurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>