<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1156 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378712</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reduce penalties and delete additions based on estimations in the case. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of specific evidence and consistency in assessments across different years, dismissing the appeals and highlighting the need for concrete evidence to support penalty amounts and additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2019 09:31:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1156 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378712</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reduce penalties and delete additions based on estimations in the case. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of specific evidence and consistency in assessments across different years, dismissing the appeals and highlighting the need for concrete evidence to support penalty amounts and additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>