<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1148 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication, citing concerns over procedural fairness, violation of principles of natural justice, and the denial of cross-examination of witnesses. The decision emphasized the need for a comprehensive reevaluation of the case, including providing relevant documents and the opportunity for cross-examination, in line with a similar case remanded for fresh consideration due to a common investigation involving multiple parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2019 09:29:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1148 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication, citing concerns over procedural fairness, violation of principles of natural justice, and the denial of cross-examination of witnesses. The decision emphasized the need for a comprehensive reevaluation of the case, including providing relevant documents and the opportunity for cross-examination, in line with a similar case remanded for fresh consideration due to a common investigation involving multiple parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>