<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1929 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280091</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the departmental Appeals challenging Orders in Appeal on merits, emphasizing the department&#039;s awareness of concessional duty clearances. The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked when full facts were known to the department. The department&#039;s Appeals were rejected on the limitation issue alone. The Tribunal also upheld the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under a specific notification for a certain period. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed the departmental Appeals, allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, and provided consequential relief, concluding the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2019 09:25:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1929 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280091</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the departmental Appeals challenging Orders in Appeal on merits, emphasizing the department&#039;s awareness of concessional duty clearances. The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked when full facts were known to the department. The department&#039;s Appeals were rejected on the limitation issue alone. The Tribunal also upheld the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under a specific notification for a certain period. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed the departmental Appeals, allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, and provided consequential relief, concluding the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>