<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1932 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280094</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the availability of CENVAT credit on additional customs duty paid through the DFCE Certificate. The allegations of clandestine removal were dismissed due to minimal discrepancies in goods, leading to no penalties being imposed. The appellant&#039;s compliance with government notifications was acknowledged, and the impugned order denying credit was overturned, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2019 09:25:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1932 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280094</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the availability of CENVAT credit on additional customs duty paid through the DFCE Certificate. The allegations of clandestine removal were dismissed due to minimal discrepancies in goods, leading to no penalties being imposed. The appellant&#039;s compliance with government notifications was acknowledged, and the impugned order denying credit was overturned, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>