<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 493 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280080</link>
    <description>In execution of land acquisition award-decrees, appropriation is stage-specific: amounts already deposited, satisfied, and received at one statutory stage cannot be reopened merely because compensation is later enhanced. Interest applies only to the unpaid balance at the relevant stage, with any shortfall appropriated first towards interest and costs and then principal. The execution court cannot go behind the decree; interest on solatium may be worked out in pending executions only where the decree has not already negatived that claim. Closed executions, or completed appropriations, cannot be reopened to introduce a fresh claim for interest on solatium.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 493 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280080</link>
      <description>In execution of land acquisition award-decrees, appropriation is stage-specific: amounts already deposited, satisfied, and received at one statutory stage cannot be reopened merely because compensation is later enhanced. Interest applies only to the unpaid balance at the relevant stage, with any shortfall appropriated first towards interest and costs and then principal. The execution court cannot go behind the decree; interest on solatium may be worked out in pending executions only where the decree has not already negatived that claim. Closed executions, or completed appropriations, cannot be reopened to introduce a fresh claim for interest on solatium.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>