<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 44 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17764</link>
    <description>A partner&#039;s retirement from a firm is not a taxable gift under the Gift-tax Act, 1958 where the transaction is part of a family arrangement or broader realignment of partnership interests and is supported by consideration. A gift requires a transfer of existing property without consideration; consideration under the Act is not limited to cash and includes money or money&#039;s worth. On the proved facts, the retiring partner&#039;s relinquishment of rights was a readjustment of partnership assets, not a gratuitous transfer. Gift-tax was therefore not exigible, and the issue was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:22:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 44 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17764</link>
      <description>A partner&#039;s retirement from a firm is not a taxable gift under the Gift-tax Act, 1958 where the transaction is part of a family arrangement or broader realignment of partnership interests and is supported by consideration. A gift requires a transfer of existing property without consideration; consideration under the Act is not limited to cash and includes money or money&#039;s worth. On the proved facts, the retiring partner&#039;s relinquishment of rights was a readjustment of partnership assets, not a gratuitous transfer. Gift-tax was therefore not exigible, and the issue was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>