<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 1103 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280076</link>
    <description>Section 254(2) permits only rectification of a manifest mistake apparent from the record; it does not allow review, recall, or rehearing on merits. An application that merely reargues the assessee&#039;s interpretation, alleges non-consideration of submissions, or challenges the earlier decision on merits cannot be treated as a rectifiable error. No mistake apparent from the record was shown, so the Miscellaneous Application was not maintainable as a request for review or recall.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:27:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 1103 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280076</link>
      <description>Section 254(2) permits only rectification of a manifest mistake apparent from the record; it does not allow review, recall, or rehearing on merits. An application that merely reargues the assessee&#039;s interpretation, alleges non-consideration of submissions, or challenges the earlier decision on merits cannot be treated as a rectifiable error. No mistake apparent from the record was shown, so the Miscellaneous Application was not maintainable as a request for review or recall.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>