<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1128 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378684</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the petition as the Operational Creditor failed to prove a debt due and payable by the Corporate Debtor, M/s Prasad and Company (Project Works) Limited. The claim was deemed premature due to the suspension of work by the Government of Maharashtra, which was considered an unforeseen event beyond the Corporate Debtor&#039;s control. As a result, the retention money was not yet owed, and no default was found.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1128 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378684</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the petition as the Operational Creditor failed to prove a debt due and payable by the Corporate Debtor, M/s Prasad and Company (Project Works) Limited. The claim was deemed premature due to the suspension of work by the Government of Maharashtra, which was considered an unforeseen event beyond the Corporate Debtor&#039;s control. As a result, the retention money was not yet owed, and no default was found.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>