<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1126 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378682</link>
    <description>The Court modified the 20% tax deposit condition imposed on the petitioner in Ext.P7 order, replacing it with a 10% deposit requirement to be paid within 45 days. The petitioner was granted the benefit of the stay order subject to meeting this revised condition. Failure to comply would nullify the stay order. The Court directed the appeal to be disposed of within four months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:53:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1126 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378682</link>
      <description>The Court modified the 20% tax deposit condition imposed on the petitioner in Ext.P7 order, replacing it with a 10% deposit requirement to be paid within 45 days. The petitioner was granted the benefit of the stay order subject to meeting this revised condition. Failure to comply would nullify the stay order. The Court directed the appeal to be disposed of within four months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>