<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 70 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17759</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that income from fixed deposit receipts should be assessed under the head &#039;Other sources&#039; rather than &#039;Business&#039; for a firm engaged in bidi manufacturing. The deduction claimed by the assessee for a loss due to premature encashment of deposits was allowed under section 71 of the Income-tax Act. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, upholding the deduction and emphasizing the provisions for set-off of losses under section 71.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:13:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 70 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17759</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that income from fixed deposit receipts should be assessed under the head &#039;Other sources&#039; rather than &#039;Business&#039; for a firm engaged in bidi manufacturing. The deduction claimed by the assessee for a loss due to premature encashment of deposits was allowed under section 71 of the Income-tax Act. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, upholding the deduction and emphasizing the provisions for set-off of losses under section 71.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>