<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1117 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378673</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that all three companies selected for comparison in the final assessment order were to be excluded, leaving no comparables. It directed a fresh search for comparables, considering the 19 companies initially selected by the appellant and the five comparables retained by the Tribunal in the previous assessment year. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 12th April 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:51:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1117 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378673</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that all three companies selected for comparison in the final assessment order were to be excluded, leaving no comparables. It directed a fresh search for comparables, considering the 19 companies initially selected by the appellant and the five comparables retained by the Tribunal in the previous assessment year. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 12th April 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>