<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1115 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378671</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were unjustified due to the debatable nature of the issues, framing of substantial questions of law by the High Court, and lack of specific charges in the penalty notices. Consequently, the penalties were deleted, and stay applications were dismissed as infructuous. The decision was pronounced on 12.04.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1115 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378671</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were unjustified due to the debatable nature of the issues, framing of substantial questions of law by the High Court, and lack of specific charges in the penalty notices. Consequently, the penalties were deleted, and stay applications were dismissed as infructuous. The decision was pronounced on 12.04.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>