<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1099 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378655</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision. The decision emphasized the importance of a fair and unbiased assessment process, requiring consideration of all relevant evidence before making additions under section 68 of the Act. It underscored the significance of proving the legitimacy of share capital and premium through proper documentation and compliance with regulatory requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:25:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1099 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378655</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision. The decision emphasized the importance of a fair and unbiased assessment process, requiring consideration of all relevant evidence before making additions under section 68 of the Act. It underscored the significance of proving the legitimacy of share capital and premium through proper documentation and compliance with regulatory requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>