<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 101 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17755</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the disallowance of expenses on repairs and maintenance of cars under section 37(3A) of the Income-tax Act. However, the Court sided with the assessee on the treatment of unpaid sales tax liability under section 43B and the deduction under sections 80HH and 80-I without deducting earlier losses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:02:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 101 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17755</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the disallowance of expenses on repairs and maintenance of cars under section 37(3A) of the Income-tax Act. However, the Court sided with the assessee on the treatment of unpaid sales tax liability under section 43B and the deduction under sections 80HH and 80-I without deducting earlier losses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>