https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378652 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to revoke the Custom House Agent (CHA) license of the appellant due to non-compliance with CHALR, 2004/CBLR, 2013 regulations and involvement in invoice manipulation to evade customs duty. The Tribunal found that the time limits for the inquiry process were not mandatory, allowing the Commissioner to disagree with the Inquiry Officer's report. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the revocation of the CHA license and forfeiture of the security deposit. en-us Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378652 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to revoke the Custom House Agent (CHA) license of the appellant due to non-compliance with CHALR, 2004/CBLR, 2013 regulations and involvement in invoice manipulation to evade customs duty. The Tribunal found that the time limits for the inquiry process were not mandatory, allowing the Commissioner to disagree with the Inquiry Officer's report. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the revocation of the CHA license and forfeiture of the security deposit. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378652