https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378643 The Tribunal found that the Adjudicating Authority failed to conduct an independent inquiry and merely adopted the CBI's findings. The Impugned Order was modified to continue the attachment of bank accounts, with the funds placed in a fixed deposit pending the final judgment. The attachment of the sole residential property was also upheld, with restrictions on disposal until the final order. The Tribunal stressed that the Adjudicating Authority's observations should not impact the Special Court's ultimate decision. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378643 The Tribunal found that the Adjudicating Authority failed to conduct an independent inquiry and merely adopted the CBI's findings. The Impugned Order was modified to continue the attachment of bank accounts, with the funds placed in a fixed deposit pending the final judgment. The attachment of the sole residential property was also upheld, with restrictions on disposal until the final order. The Tribunal stressed that the Adjudicating Authority's observations should not impact the Special Court's ultimate decision. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378643