<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1085 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378641</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order dated 26.05.2017. The seized currency was to be returned to the appellant as it belonged to his father. The respondent could retain a copy of the HDD before returning it to the appellant. The documents/records were to be returned to the appellant immediately. No costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 07:34:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1085 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378641</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order dated 26.05.2017. The seized currency was to be returned to the appellant as it belonged to his father. The respondent could retain a copy of the HDD before returning it to the appellant. The documents/records were to be returned to the appellant immediately. No costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>