<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1083 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378639</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating authority for re-examination of the entitlement to CENVAT Credit on floor insulation work, interior design work, and hotel charges. The Tribunal found merit in the Appellant&#039;s arguments, directing a review of all input service invoices and consideration of relevant case laws to determine the eligibility of CENVAT Credit. The appeal was allowed for further examination and consideration, keeping all issues open for review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 07:32:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1083 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378639</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating authority for re-examination of the entitlement to CENVAT Credit on floor insulation work, interior design work, and hotel charges. The Tribunal found merit in the Appellant&#039;s arguments, directing a review of all input service invoices and consideration of relevant case laws to determine the eligibility of CENVAT Credit. The appeal was allowed for further examination and consideration, keeping all issues open for review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>