<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1080 - CESTAT kolkata</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378636</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand beyond the normal period of limitation and the imposed penalties. The demand within the normal period, along with interest, was confirmed. The Tribunal concluded that the extended period could not be invoked, and penalties were unjustified, considering the interpretational nature of the issue and consistent Tribunal views.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 07:26:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1080 - CESTAT kolkata</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378636</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand beyond the normal period of limitation and the imposed penalties. The demand within the normal period, along with interest, was confirmed. The Tribunal concluded that the extended period could not be invoked, and penalties were unjustified, considering the interpretational nature of the issue and consistent Tribunal views.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>