<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1077 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378633</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the appellant company, granting the benefit to discharge 25% of the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, subject to conditions. Appeals by individuals were also allowed, with the Tribunal setting aside the imposition of personal penalty on the Director and employee under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 07:08:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1077 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378633</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the appellant company, granting the benefit to discharge 25% of the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, subject to conditions. Appeals by individuals were also allowed, with the Tribunal setting aside the imposition of personal penalty on the Director and employee under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>