<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1074 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378630</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the matter to the Adjudicating authority for a fresh decision in light of a Supreme Court judgment. The Adjudicating authority was directed to include royalty charges paid by the company in the assessable value and allow the appellants to present relevant evidence, keeping all issues open for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 06:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1074 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378630</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the matter to the Adjudicating authority for a fresh decision in light of a Supreme Court judgment. The Adjudicating authority was directed to include royalty charges paid by the company in the assessable value and allow the appellants to present relevant evidence, keeping all issues open for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>