<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1071 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378627</link>
    <description>Penalty and interest under Sections 11AC and 11AB of the Central Excise Act could not be sustained where no adjudication proceedings under Section 11A had been initiated or concluded. The text explains that both penalty and interest depend on a prior determination of duty liability for evasion under Section 11A, and in the absence of such determination there was no statutory basis to invoke the consequential provisions. The order imposing penalty and interest was therefore unsustainable, with the result favouring the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 06:34:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1071 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378627</link>
      <description>Penalty and interest under Sections 11AC and 11AB of the Central Excise Act could not be sustained where no adjudication proceedings under Section 11A had been initiated or concluded. The text explains that both penalty and interest depend on a prior determination of duty liability for evasion under Section 11A, and in the absence of such determination there was no statutory basis to invoke the consequential provisions. The order imposing penalty and interest was therefore unsustainable, with the result favouring the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>