https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378622 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. The demand for differential duty on handling charges collected from wholesale customers was set aside as duty for goods under MRP assessment is based solely on MRP. Additionally, the valuation of metal containers stock transferred to another unit was deemed revenue-neutral as the duty paid was availed as Cenvat Credit by the receiving unit. The Tribunal referenced legal principles and precedents to support its decision, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal, providing relief to the appellant in the disputed matters. en-us Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Apr 2019 06:24:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378622 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. The demand for differential duty on handling charges collected from wholesale customers was set aside as duty for goods under MRP assessment is based solely on MRP. Additionally, the valuation of metal containers stock transferred to another unit was deemed revenue-neutral as the duty paid was availed as Cenvat Credit by the receiving unit. The Tribunal referenced legal principles and precedents to support its decision, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal, providing relief to the appellant in the disputed matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378622