<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 42 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17750</link>
    <description>The High Court held that Section 40(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applied to the commission payments made by the assessee-company. The Court justified the reopening of the assessment due to non-disclosure of the relationship between the commission recipient and the shareholders. Consequently, the excess commission payment was disallowed under Section 40(c), ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:47:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 42 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17750</link>
      <description>The High Court held that Section 40(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applied to the commission payments made by the assessee-company. The Court justified the reopening of the assessment due to non-disclosure of the relationship between the commission recipient and the shareholders. Consequently, the excess commission payment was disallowed under Section 40(c), ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>