<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1498 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280057</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer failed to adequately investigate a disputed entry regarding an undisclosed receipt based on a TDS discrepancy. It emphasized the officer&#039;s duty to verify the genuineness of entries independently and not shift the burden to the assessee. The Tribunal directed a fresh examination of the matter, instructing the officer to locate the company and its directors for verification. It set aside previous orders and remitted the issue for reevaluation, stressing the importance of ensuring a just outcome based on accurate information and legal provisions. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 05:57:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1498 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280057</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer failed to adequately investigate a disputed entry regarding an undisclosed receipt based on a TDS discrepancy. It emphasized the officer&#039;s duty to verify the genuineness of entries independently and not shift the burden to the assessee. The Tribunal directed a fresh examination of the matter, instructing the officer to locate the company and its directors for verification. It set aside previous orders and remitted the issue for reevaluation, stressing the importance of ensuring a just outcome based on accurate information and legal provisions. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>