<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1511 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280056</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s jurisdiction to enhance assessed income based on re-evaluation of existing seized material. The Tribunal restricted the enhancement to Rs. 61.65 lakhs for unexplained investments, offering partial relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 05:57:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1511 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280056</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s jurisdiction to enhance assessed income based on re-evaluation of existing seized material. The Tribunal restricted the enhancement to Rs. 61.65 lakhs for unexplained investments, offering partial relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>