https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378606 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods imported as 'parts of electric iron' due to non-compliance with safety standards, ordering re-export without redemption or penalties. The decision aligned with the Supreme Court's stance that duty liability must be established before being demanded, emphasizing the importance of compliance with Bureau of Indian Standards norms to ensure public health and avoid financial burden on the Central Government. The Tribunal found that the imported goods, although essential for 'electric irons,' must meet safety standards, ultimately ruling in favor of re-export to enforce compliance. en-us Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378606 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods imported as 'parts of electric iron' due to non-compliance with safety standards, ordering re-export without redemption or penalties. The decision aligned with the Supreme Court's stance that duty liability must be established before being demanded, emphasizing the importance of compliance with Bureau of Indian Standards norms to ensure public health and avoid financial burden on the Central Government. The Tribunal found that the imported goods, although essential for 'electric irons,' must meet safety standards, ultimately ruling in favor of re-export to enforce compliance. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378606