<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 50 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17741</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the new unit did not qualify as a separate industrial undertaking eligible for deduction under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court agreed with the findings that the new unit was an extension of the existing one, based on shared facilities and operational commonalities, leading to the denial of the deduction claimed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:09:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 50 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17741</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the new unit did not qualify as a separate industrial undertaking eligible for deduction under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court agreed with the findings that the new unit was an extension of the existing one, based on shared facilities and operational commonalities, leading to the denial of the deduction claimed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>