<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1028 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378584</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 15,37,400 made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found that the cash deposits were adequately explained through evidence of business activities and disclosed interest income. It concluded that the addition was unjustified, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decisions and removing the entire amount from the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 08:24:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1028 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378584</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 15,37,400 made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found that the cash deposits were adequately explained through evidence of business activities and disclosed interest income. It concluded that the addition was unjustified, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decisions and removing the entire amount from the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>