<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1024 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378580</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s exemption claim under Section 54 F of the Income Tax Act, stating that joint ownership does not constitute absolute ownership for exemption purposes. The Assessing Officer was directed to grant the exemption, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeal with certain grounds becoming irrelevant and others needing no further adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1024 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378580</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s exemption claim under Section 54 F of the Income Tax Act, stating that joint ownership does not constitute absolute ownership for exemption purposes. The Assessing Officer was directed to grant the exemption, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeal with certain grounds becoming irrelevant and others needing no further adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>