<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 58 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17739</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal incorrectly interpreted Section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The deduction claimed by the assessee for sales tax liability not paid within the accounting year was rightly disallowed. The court emphasized the strict nature of the provision, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:05:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 58 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17739</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal incorrectly interpreted Section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The deduction claimed by the assessee for sales tax liability not paid within the accounting year was rightly disallowed. The court emphasized the strict nature of the provision, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>