<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1001 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378557</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain an appeal challenging the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court noted that issues related to the valuation of goods for assessment fall under the Supreme Court&#039;s jurisdiction. Despite arguments regarding other substantive questions of law, the Court directed the appellant to approach the Supreme Court for appropriate proceedings, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions. The appeal was disposed of by returning the Memorandum of Appeal to the appellant for further action before the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 08:22:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1001 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378557</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain an appeal challenging the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court noted that issues related to the valuation of goods for assessment fall under the Supreme Court&#039;s jurisdiction. Despite arguments regarding other substantive questions of law, the Court directed the appellant to approach the Supreme Court for appropriate proceedings, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions. The appeal was disposed of by returning the Memorandum of Appeal to the appellant for further action before the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>