https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378544 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee regarding the denial of Cenvat credit for garden maintenance services from December 2013 to March 2016. Relying on a decision by the Hon'ble Chennai High Court, the Tribunal held that garden maintenance services were eligible inputs even after 1.4.2011. Additionally, the Tribunal found that a major part of the demand was barred by limitation due to the appellant's transparent compliance, setting aside the impugned order and providing relief to the appellant while dismissing the Revenue's cross-appeal. en-us Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Apr 2019 08:21:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378544 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee regarding the denial of Cenvat credit for garden maintenance services from December 2013 to March 2016. Relying on a decision by the Hon'ble Chennai High Court, the Tribunal held that garden maintenance services were eligible inputs even after 1.4.2011. Additionally, the Tribunal found that a major part of the demand was barred by limitation due to the appellant's transparent compliance, setting aside the impugned order and providing relief to the appellant while dismissing the Revenue's cross-appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378544