<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1920 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280040</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was based on the interpretation that waste and scrap of wires and cables did not fall under the relevant tariff heading, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s claims for recovery of duty, interest payment, and penalty imposition. The Tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the Lower Appellate Authority&#039;s decision, ultimately sustaining the order in favor of the Respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1920 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280040</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was based on the interpretation that waste and scrap of wires and cables did not fall under the relevant tariff heading, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s claims for recovery of duty, interest payment, and penalty imposition. The Tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the Lower Appellate Authority&#039;s decision, ultimately sustaining the order in favor of the Respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>