<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1924 - CESTAT KOLATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280044</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a coal production entity, in a case concerning the interpretation of service tax provisions on Goods Transport Service. The dispute centered on the validity of a 75% abatement on freight charges for transportation services and the requirement of declarations on consignment notes. The tribunal held that declarations on transporters&#039; letterheads sufficed for claiming abatement benefits, contrary to the tax department&#039;s insistence on consignment notes. The appellant was deemed entitled to the abatement benefits despite procedural lapses, leading to the appeal&#039;s success and granting of consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 20:52:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1924 - CESTAT KOLATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280044</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a coal production entity, in a case concerning the interpretation of service tax provisions on Goods Transport Service. The dispute centered on the validity of a 75% abatement on freight charges for transportation services and the requirement of declarations on consignment notes. The tribunal held that declarations on transporters&#039; letterheads sufficed for claiming abatement benefits, contrary to the tax department&#039;s insistence on consignment notes. The appellant was deemed entitled to the abatement benefits despite procedural lapses, leading to the appeal&#039;s success and granting of consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>