https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280032 The appellate court ruled in favor of the appellant on various issues including ownership of the property, validity of the sale deed, undue influence, status of the second defendant as a bona fide purchaser, liability under the promissory note, and court fee valuation. The court found the plaintiff to be the real owner, declared the sale deed void, and held the promissory note unenforceable due to undue influence. The judgment and decree of the trial court were restored in favor of the appellant, with legal representatives of the first respondent directed to pay court fees. en-us Mon, 17 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:46:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280032 The appellate court ruled in favor of the appellant on various issues including ownership of the property, validity of the sale deed, undue influence, status of the second defendant as a bona fide purchaser, liability under the promissory note, and court fee valuation. The court found the plaintiff to be the real owner, declared the sale deed void, and held the promissory note unenforceable due to undue influence. The judgment and decree of the trial court were restored in favor of the appellant, with legal representatives of the first respondent directed to pay court fees. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280032